Why you need coaching

Why should you pay for Nordic walking instruction? Can't you do it on your own? Yes, but…

A comparison of Nordic walking under supervision and home exercise done without supervision showed that supervision (coaching) contributed to improved fitness of Nordic walkers over those working out on their own. The Nordic walkers walked farther without discomfort.

The study didn't dwell too much on why the Nordic walkers did better. It seems to me developing the skill to Nordic walk requires coaching, and coaches encourage their students. Nordic walking technique, properly executed, allows walkers to make the most of the exercise, and coaches help walkers master the technique.

Check out a local Nordic walking coach. None in your area? Contact me for help.
International Nordic Walking Convention

Has started...

 
Increasing physical activity

A research article described an investigation to determine factors that led to increased physical activity. The participants were overweight middle-aged men with impaired glucose regulation, and one group Nordic walked, another group took up resistance training, and the third group didn't do anything different (control group). The control group acted as the part of population that doesn't do anything different from what they normally do.

All the groups started the study at similar levels of total physical activity. Total physical activity in the study consisted of:
  • Occupational (or other daytime) physical activity (OPA): What you do at work.
  • Commuting (or transition) physical activity (CPA): What you do to get to work.
  • Leisure-time physical activity (LTPA): What you do for fun.
  • Miscellaneous home physical activity (MHPA): The household chores you do.
  • Structured physical exercise activity (SPEA = Nordic walking or resistance training activities): What you do when you set aside time to work out.
  • Sleep: What you do when your eyes are closed.

In structured physical activity (workout sessions), intensity was higher in the Nordic walking group than in the resistance training group. Increasing intensity was seen as more beneficial to fitness than increasing the amount of exercise. We need to understand a key point, however.
Intensity was measured by metabolic equivalent of task (MET). It's a multiple of your energy expended at rest. If you do an activity where the MET is rated as 5, you're expending 5 times the energy expended at rest. Then you multiply the minutes you do that activity to get a final result. If you perform that MET 5 activity for 50 minutes, your total intensity is 5 X 50 = 250. MET provides a way to compare different activities.

Note: MET looks like it's really more of an aerobic measure, so I'm not sure how resistance exercise can really be compared. Weight lifters have to manage their sessions closely because the lifts break down muscle and require recovery time. Nordic walkers can go longer and more frequently.

Overall physical activity didn't increase, but, in comparison to the control group, the researchers reported the Nordic walking group increased their leisure-time physical activity significantly but not in the resistance training group. However, as leisure-time physical activity increased, other kinds of physical activity decreased to compensate. The researchers stopped short of reflecting on why the increase happened. I think the low impact of Nordic walking and how Nordic walkers don't feel like they're working harder even if they really are is a factor in encouraging people to step up their activity.